Home  ›  Reading Plan the Biblical Narrative in Five Acts

Reading Plan the Biblical Narrative in Five Acts

Written By Thursday, March 3, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Creation myth of both Judaism and Christianity

The Genesis creation narrative is the cosmos myth[a] of both Judaism and Christianity.[ane] The narrative is made up of two stories, roughly equivalent to the first ii capacity of the Volume of Genesis. In the first, Elohim (the Hebrew generic discussion for God) creates the heavens and the Earth in six days, so rests on, blesses and sanctifies the seventh (i.east. the Biblical Sabbath). In the second story, God, now referred to past the personal proper name Yahweh, creates Adam, the beginning man, from grit and places him in the Garden of Eden, where he is given rule over the animals. Eve, the first woman, is created from Adam as his companion.

Information technology expounds themes parallel to those in Mesopotamian mythology, emphasizing the Israelite people's conventionalities in i God.[2] The get-go major comprehensive typhoon of the Pentateuch (the series of five books which begins with Genesis and ends with Deuteronomy) was composed in the late 7th or the 6th century BCE (the Jahwist source) and was after expanded past other authors (the Priestly source) into a piece of work very like Genesis equally known today.[3] The 2 sources can exist identified in the cosmos narrative: Priestly and Jahwistic.[4] The combined narrative is a critique of the Mesopotamian theology of creation: Genesis affirms monotheism and denies polytheism.[5] Robert Alter described the combined narrative as "compelling in its archetypal character, its accommodation of myth to monotheistic ends".[six]

In contempo centuries, some believers have used this narrative equally evidence of literal creationism, leading them to afterwards deny evolution.[seven] Scholars practice not consider Genesis to be historically accurate.

Composition [edit]

Sources [edit]

Although tradition attributes Genesis to Moses, biblical scholars concord that it, together with the post-obit four books (making up what Jews call the Torah and biblical scholars phone call the Pentateuch), is "a blended piece of work, the production of many hands and periods."[8] A common hypothesis among biblical scholars today is that the first major comprehensive typhoon of the Pentateuch was composed in the late 7th or the sixth century BCE (the Jahwist source), and that this was after expanded by the addition of diverse narratives and laws (the Priestly source) into a work very like the one existing today.[three]

Every bit for the historical background which led to the creation of the narrative itself, a theory which has gained considerable involvement, although nevertheless controversial, is "Western farsi purple dominance". This proposes that the Persians, after their conquest of Babylon in 538 BCE, agreed to grant Jerusalem a large measure of local autonomy inside the empire, but required the local government to produce a single law lawmaking accepted by the entire customs. It further proposes that in that location were two powerful groups in the customs – the priestly families who controlled the Temple, and the landowning families who made upwards the "elders" – and that these two groups were in conflict over many issues, and that each had its own "history of origins", just the Persian promise of greatly increased local autonomy for all provided a powerful incentive to cooperate in producing a single text.[9]

Structure [edit]

The creation narrative is fabricated up of ii stories, roughly equivalent to the two offset chapters of the Book of Genesis[10] (there are no affiliate divisions in the original Hebrew text; encounter Capacity and verses of the Bible). The first account (Genesis ane:1–two:three) employs a repetitious construction of divine fiat and fulfillment, and so the statement "And there was evening and there was morn, the [x th] day," for each of the six days of cosmos. In each of the start three days there is an human action of division: solar day one divides the darkness from light, day two the "waters above" from the "waters below", and 24-hour interval three the sea from the land. In each of the next iii days these divisions are populated: twenty-four hours four populates the darkness and lite with Sunday, Moon and stars; mean solar day v populates seas and skies with fish and fowl; and finally land-based creatures and mankind populate the land.[eleven]

Consistency was patently not seen as essential to storytelling in ancient Almost Eastern literature.[12] The overlapping stories of Genesis 1 and 2 are contradictory just also complementary, with the first (the Priestly story) concerned with the cosmos of the entire cosmos while the second (the Yahwist story) focuses on man as moral agent and cultivator of his surroundings.[10] The highly regimented seven-24-hour interval narrative of Genesis i features an omnipotent God who creates a god-like humanity, while the 1-twenty-four hour period creation of Genesis ii uses a unproblematic linear narrative, a God who tin fail besides as succeed, and a humanity which is not god-like but is punished for acts which would lead to their condign god-like.[13] Fifty-fifty the club and method of cosmos differs.[13] "Together, this combination of parallel character and contrasting profile point to the different origin of materials in Genesis 1 and Genesis ii, however elegantly they have now been combined."[14]

The primary accounts in each chapter are joined by a literary span at Genesis 2:4, "These are the generations of the heavens and of the globe when they were created." This echoes the first line of Genesis 1, "In the first God created the heaven and the earth", and is reversed in the next phrase, "...in the solar day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens". This poesy is one of ten "generations" (Hebrew: תולדות toledot ) phrases used throughout Genesis, which provide a literary structure to the volume.[xv] They normally function as headings to what comes subsequently, but the position of this, the starting time of the series, has been the subject of much fence.[16]

Mesopotamian influence [edit]

Comparative mythology provides historical and cross-cultural perspectives for Jewish mythology. Both sources behind the Genesis cosmos narrative borrowed themes from Mesopotamian mythology,[17] [xviii] but adapted them to their belief in one God,[2] establishing a monotheistic creation in opposition to the polytheistic creation myth of ancient State of israel's neighbors.[19] [20]

Genesis ane–11 as a whole is imbued with Mesopotamian myths.[17] [21] Genesis 1 bears both striking differences from and striking similarities to Babylon's national cosmos myth, the Enuma Elish.[18] On the side of similarities, both begin from a phase of chaotic waters before anything is created, in both a fixed dome-shaped "firmament" divides these waters from the habitable Earth, and both conclude with the creation of a homo chosen "man" and the building of a temple for the god (in Genesis 1, this temple is the entire creation).[22] On the side of contrasts, Genesis 1 is monotheistic; it makes no try to business relationship for the origins of God, and at that place is no trace of the resistance to the reduction of anarchy to order (Greek: theomachy, lit. "God-fighting"), all of which mark the Mesopotamian creation accounts.[2] Still, Genesis ane bears similarities to the Baal Cycle of Israel'south neighbour, Ugarit.[23]

The Enuma Elish has also left traces on Genesis two. Both begin with a series of statements of what did not exist at the moment when creation began; the Enuma Elish has a jump (in the sea) as the point where cosmos begins, paralleling the spring (on the land – Genesis 2 is notable for existence a "dry out" creation story) in Genesis 2:half dozen that "watered the whole face of the ground"; in both myths, Yahweh/the gods kickoff create a homo to serve him/them, then animals and vegetation. At the same time, and equally with Genesis one, the Jewish version has drastically changed its Babylonian model: Eve, for example, seems to fill the role of a female parent goddess when, in Genesis iv:ane, she says that she has "created a man with Yahweh", but she is not a divine being similar her Babylonian counterpart.[24]

Genesis 2 has close parallels with a second Mesopotamian myth, the Atra-Hasis epic – parallels that in fact extend throughout Genesis ii–11, from the Creation to the Flood and its aftermath. The two share numerous plot-details (e.g. the divine garden and the office of the outset human being in the garden, the cosmos of the human from a mixture of earth and divine substance, the gamble of immortality, etc.), and have a similar overall theme: the gradual clarification of homo'southward relationship with God(s) and animals.[25]

Cosmos past word and creation past combat [edit]

The narratives in Genesis 1 and 2 were not the only cosmos myths in ancient Israel, and the complete biblical testify suggests two contrasting models.[26] The first is the "logos" (meaning spoken language) model, where a supreme God "speaks" dormant matter into existence. The second is the "agon" (meaning struggle or combat) model, in which it is God's victory in battle over the monsters of the ocean that mark his sovereignty and might.[27] Genesis 1 is an example of creation by speech, while Psalm 74 and Isaiah 51 are examples of the "agon" mythology, recalling a Canaanite myth in which God creates the earth by vanquishing the water deities: "Awake, awake! ... It was you that hacked Rahab in pieces, that pierced the Dragon! It was you that dried up the Ocean, the waters of the smashing Deep, that made the abysses of the Sea a road that the redeemed might walk..."[28]

Start narrative: Genesis one:1–2:three [edit]

Background [edit]

The cosmos created in Genesis 1 bears a striking resemblance to the Tabernacle in Exodus 35–40, which was the image of the Temple in Jerusalem and the focus of priestly worship of Yahweh; for this reason, and because other Eye Eastern creation stories also climax with the construction of a temple/house for the creator-god, Genesis 1 can exist interpreted every bit a description of the structure of the cosmos as God'southward firm, for which the Temple in Jerusalem served equally the earthly representative.[29]

The word bara is translated as "created" in English, just the concept information technology embodied was non the aforementioned as the modern term: in the world of the ancient Most East, the gods demonstrated their power over the globe not by creating affair simply by fixing destinies, then that the essence of the bara which God performs in Genesis concerns bringing "heaven and world" (a set phrase meaning "everything") into beingness by organising and assigning roles and functions.[xxx]

The use of numbers in ancient texts was often numerological rather than factual – that is, the numbers were used because they held some symbolic value to the author.[31] The number 7, denoting divine completion, permeates Genesis i: verse i:ane consists of seven words, poesy 1:2 of 14, and ii:1–three has 35 words (5×7); Elohim is mentioned 35 times, "heaven/firmament" and "earth" 21 times each, and the phrases "and information technology was so" and "God saw that information technology was good" occur 7 times each.[32]

Amidst commentators, symbolic estimation of the numbers may coexist with factual interpretations.[33] Numerologically significant patterns of repeated words and phrases are termed "Hebraic meter". They begin in the creation narrative and continue through the book of Genesis.[33]

Pre-creation: Genesis ane:1–2 [edit]

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the globe was without course, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the confront of the waters.[34]

Although the opening phrase of Genesis one:1 is commonly translated in English language as higher up, the Hebrew is ambiguous, and tin be translated at least iii ways:

  1. as a statement that the cosmos had an absolute first ("In the beginning God created the sky and the world.");
  2. every bit a argument describing the condition of the earth when God began creating ("When in the outset God created the heavens and the world, the globe was untamed and shapeless."); and
  3. essentially similar to the 2d version but taking all of Genesis 1:2 as background information ("When in the beginning God created the heavens and the globe – the earth being untamed and shapeless... – God said, Permit at that place be light!").[35]

The 2nd seems to be the meaning intended by the original Priestly author: the verb bara is used only of God (people do not engage in bara), and it concerns the assignment of roles, equally in the creation of the first people as "male and female person" (i.due east., it allocates them sexes): in other words, the power of God is being shown not by the creation of matter only past the fixing of destinies.[30]

The heavens and the earth is a set phrase meaning "everything", i.e., the cosmos. This was made up of iii levels, the habitable earth in the heart, the heavens above, and an underworld below, all surrounded by a watery "bounding main" of anarchy as the Babylonian Tiamat.[36] The Globe itself was a flat disc, surrounded by mountains or sea. Above information technology was the firmament, a transparent merely solid dome resting on the mountains, assuasive men to run into the blue of the waters above, with "windows" to allow the rain to enter, and containing the Sun, Moon and stars. The waters extended beneath the World, which rested on pillars sunk in the waters, and in the underworld was Sheol, the dwelling house of the dead.[37]

The opening of Genesis 1 continues: "And the globe was formless and void..." The phrase "formless and void" is a translation of the Hebrew tohu wa-bohu , (Hebrew: תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ), anarchy, the status that bara, ordering, remedies.[38] Tohu past itself means "emptiness, futility"; it is used to draw the desert wilderness; bohu has no known meaning and was apparently coined to rhyme with and reinforce tohu.[39] The phrase appears also in Jeremiah 4:23 where the prophet warns Israel that rebellion against God will lead to the render of darkness and chaos, "every bit if the earth had been 'uncreated'".[xl]

The opening of Genesis 1 concludes with a statement that "darkness was on the face of the deep" (Hebrew: תְהוֹם tehôm ), [the] "darkness" and the "deep" being two of the three elements of the chaos represented in tohu wa-bohu (the third is the "formless earth"). In the Enuma Elish, the "deep" is personified as the goddess Tiamat, the enemy of Marduk;[38] hither it is the formless body of primeval water surrounding the habitable world, later to exist released during the Deluge, when "all the fountains of the great deep burst forth" from the waters beneath the earth and from the "windows" of the heaven.[41]

The ruach of God moves over the face of the deep before creation begins. Ruach ( רוּחַ ) has the meanings "wind, spirit, breath", and elohim can mean "great" too as "god": the ruach elohim may therefore mean the "wind/breath of God" (the tempest-wind is God's breath in Psalms xviii:16 and elsewhere, and the wind of God returns in the Inundation story every bit the ways by which God restores the World), or God's "spirit", a concept which is somewhat vague in the Hebrew Bible, or it may simply signify a great storm-wind.[42]

Half dozen days of Creation: Genesis 1:3–2:3 [edit]

God's first act was the cosmos of undifferentiated light; dark and light were and then separated into dark and day, their club (evening before morning) signifying that this was the liturgical 24-hour interval; and then the Sun, Moon and stars were created to marking the proper times for the festivals of the week and yr. Only when this is done does God create man and woman and the means to sustain them (plants and animals). At the end of the sixth twenty-four hour period, when creation is complete, the world is a cosmic temple in which the part of humanity is the worship of God. This parallels Mesopotamian myth (the Enuma Elish) and likewise echoes chapter 38 of the Book of Task, where God recalls how the stars, the "sons of God", sang when the corner-stone of creation was laid.[43]

First mean solar day [edit]

three And God said: 'Allow there be light.' And there was light. 4 And God saw the low-cal, that information technology was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God chosen the light Mean solar day, and the darkness He called Dark. And there was evening and in that location was morning, i day.[44]

Day 1 begins with the creation of low-cal. God creates past spoken command and names the elements of the world as he creates them. In the ancient Nigh Due east the act of naming was bound up with the act of creating: thus in Egyptian literature the creator god pronounced the names of everything, and the Enûma Elish begins at the point where nothing has yet been named.[45] God's creation by speech communication also suggests that he is being compared to a rex, who has but to speak for things to happen.[46]

Second day [edit]

6 And God said: 'Let there exist a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let information technology split up the waters from the waters.' 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were nether the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so. 8 And God called the firmament Sky. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.[47]

Rāqîa, the word translated every bit empyrean, is from rāqa', the verb used for the act of chirapsia metal into thin plates.[48] Created on the second twenty-four hour period of cosmos and populated by luminaries on the 4th, it is a solid dome which separates the Earth beneath from the heavens and their waters in a higher place, as in Egyptian and Mesopotamian belief of the aforementioned time.[49] In Genesis 1:17 the stars are set in the raqia'; in Babylonian myth the heavens were made of diverse precious stones (compare Exodus 24:x where the elders of Israel see God on the sapphire floor of heaven), with the stars engraved in their surface.[50]

Third day [edit]

And God said: 'Allow the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and permit the dry state appear.' And it was so. 10 And God called the dry out land Earth, and the gathering together of the waters chosen He Seas; and God saw that it was good. 11 And God said: 'Let the earth put forth grass, herb yielding seed, and fruit-tree begetting fruit subsequently its kind, wherein is the seed thereof, upon the earth.' And information technology was so. 12 And the earth brought forth grass, herb yielding seed after its kind, and tree bearing fruit, wherein is the seed thereof, after its kind; and God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening and there was morning time, a third day.[51]

On the third day, the waters withdraw, creating a ring of ocean surrounding a single circular continent.[52] By the end of the third day God has created a foundational environment of calorie-free, heavens, seas and globe.[53] The three levels of the cosmos are adjacent populated in the same order in which they were created – heavens, bounding main, globe.

God does non create or make trees and plants, but instead commands the globe to produce them. The underlying theological meaning seems to exist that God has given the previously barren globe the ability to produce vegetation, and it now does so at his command. "According to (one's) kind" appears to wait forward to the laws establish later in the Pentateuch, which lay great stress on holiness through separation.[54]

Fourth day [edit]

xiv And God said: 'Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to carve up the day from the nighttime; and permit them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to requite light upon the globe.' And it was and so. 16 And God made the ii great lights: the greater calorie-free to rule the day, and the lesser calorie-free to rule the night; and the stars. 17 And God set them in the firmament of the sky to give light upon the earth, eighteen and to rule over the twenty-four hours and over the nighttime, and to separate the light from the darkness; and God saw that it was good. xix And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth twenty-four hour period.[55]

On Day Four the language of "ruling" is introduced: the heavenly bodies volition "govern" 24-hour interval and night and mark seasons and years and days (a matter of crucial importance to the Priestly authors, as the three pilgrimage festivals were organised around the cycles of both the Dominicus and Moon, in a lunisolar calendar that could have either 12 or 13 months.);[56] afterwards, human will be created to rule over the whole of creation equally God's regent. God puts "lights" in the firmament to "rule over" the day and the night.[57] Specifically, God creates the "greater low-cal," the "lesser lite," and the stars. According to Victor Hamilton, most scholars agree that the choice of "greater low-cal" and "bottom lite", rather than the more than explicit "Sunday" and "Moon", is anti-mythological rhetoric intended to contradict widespread contemporary behavior that the Dominicus and the Moon were deities themselves.[58]

Fifth day [edit]

And God said: 'Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures, and permit fowl fly above the world in the open empyrean of heaven.' 21 And God created the great sea-monsters, and every living brute that creepeth, wherewith the waters swarmed, later on its kind, and every winged fowl after its kind; and God saw that it was good. 22 And God blessed them, saying: 'Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the world.' 23 And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.[59]

In the Egyptian and Mesopotamian mythologies, the creator-god has to do battle with the sea-monsters before he tin can make heaven and earth; in Genesis 1:21, the word tannin, sometimes translated as "sea monsters" or "great creatures", parallels the named chaos-monsters Rahab and Leviathan from Psalm 74:13, and Isaiah 27:i, and Isaiah 51:9, merely there is no hint (in Genesis) of combat, and the tannin are simply creatures created by God.[60]

Sixth day [edit]

The Creation of the Animals (1506–1511), by Grão Vasco

24 And God said: 'Let the earth bring forth the living creature afterwards its kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth later on its kind.' And information technology was so. 25 And God fabricated the beast of the earth after its kind, and the cattle subsequently their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the ground afterward its kind; and God saw that information technology was skillful.

26 And God said: 'Allow us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the globe, and over every creeping affair that creepeth upon the globe.' 27 And God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male person and female created He them. 28 And God blessed them; and God said unto them: 'Exist fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the world, and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that creepeth upon the world.' 29 And God said: 'Behold, I accept given y'all every herb yielding seed, which is upon the face of all the globe, and every tree, in which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed--to y'all it shall exist for food; 30 and to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every matter that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is a living soul, [I have given] every light-green herb for food.' And it was and so.31 And God saw every affair that He had fabricated, and, behold, information technology was very skilful. And in that location was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.[61]

When in Genesis one:26 God says "Let us make human being", the Hebrew give-and-take used is adam; in this course it is a generic noun, "mankind", and does not imply that this creation is male. After this start mention the give-and-take e'er appears as ha-adam, "the human being", but equally Genesis 1:27 shows ("And so God created man in his [own] paradigm, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."), the word is however not exclusively male.[62]

Homo was created in the "image of God". The meaning of this is unclear: suggestions include:

  1. Having the spiritual qualities of God such every bit intellect, volition, etc.;
  2. Having the physical form of God;
  3. A combination of these two;
  4. Being God's counterpart on World and able to enter into a human relationship with him;
  5. Beingness God's representative or viceroy on Earth.[63]

The fact that God says "Let us make man..." has given rising to several theories, of which the 2 most of import are that "us" is majestic plural,[64] or that it reflects a setting in a divine council with God enthroned as male monarch and proposing the creation of mankind to the lesser divine beings.[65]

God tells the animals and humans that he has given them "the green plants for food" – cosmos is to be vegetarian. Just later on, later on the Flood, is human being given permission to consume flesh. The Priestly writer of Genesis appears to look dorsum to an ideal past in which mankind lived at peace both with itself and with the animal kingdom, and which could be re-achieved through a proper sacrificial life in harmony with God.[66]

Upon completion, God sees that "every thing that He had made ... was very good" (Genesis 1:31). This implies that the materials that existed earlier the Creation ("tohu wa-bohu," "darkness," "tehom") were non "very good." Israel Knohl hypothesized that the Priestly source gear up this dichotomy to mitigate the problem of evil.[67]

Seventh day: divine residual [edit]

And the heaven and the world were finished, and all the host of them. two And on the seventh day God finished His work which He had made; and He rested on the 7th day from all His work which He had fabricated. 3 And God blessed the seventh twenty-four hour period, and hallowed it; because that in it He rested from all His piece of work which God in creating had fabricated.[68]

Creation is followed by residuum. In ancient About Eastern literature the divine rest is accomplished in a temple equally a effect of having brought order to chaos. Rest is both detachment, equally the work of cosmos is finished, but also engagement, every bit the deity is now present in his temple to maintain a secure and ordered cosmos.[69] Compare with Exodus 20:8–20:11: "Retrieve the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Half dozen days shalt thou labour, and practise all thy work; just the seventh twenty-four hour period is a sabbath unto the LORD thy One thousandOD, in it thou shalt not do whatsoever manner of work, thousand, nor thy son, nor thy girl, nor thy human-servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is inside thy gates; for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested on the seventh day; wherefore the FiftyORD blessed the sabbath 24-hour interval, and hallowed it."

2nd narrative: Genesis 2:4–2:25 [edit]

Genesis 2–3, the Garden of Eden story, was probably authored around 500 BCE as "a discourse on ideals in life, the danger in human celebrity, and the fundamentally ambiguous nature of humanity – especially human being mental faculties".[lxx] The Garden in which the activeness takes identify lies on the mythological border betwixt the human and the divine worlds, probably on the far side of the cosmic body of water near the rim of the globe; following a conventional aboriginal Almost Eastern concept, the Eden river outset forms that ocean and then divides into iv rivers which run from the 4 corners of the earth towards its heart.[seventy] It opens "in the 24-hour interval that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens", a ready introduction like to those plant in Babylonian myths.[71] Before the man is created the earth is a barren waste watered past an 'êḏ (אד‎); Genesis 2:6 the King James Version translated this every bit "mist", post-obit Jewish practice, merely since the mid-20th century Hebraists have generally accepted that the real pregnant is "spring of underground water".[72]

In Genesis ane the feature word for God's activity is bara, "created"; in Genesis 2 the word used when he creates the human being is yatsar (ייצר‎ yîṣer), meaning "fashioned", a word used in contexts such as a potter fashioning a pot from clay.[73] God breathes his own breath into the clay and it becomes nephesh (נֶ֫פֶשׁ‎), a word meaning "life", "vitality", "the living personality"; homo shares nephesh with all creatures, but the text describes this life-giving deed by God only in relation to man.[74]

Eden, where God puts his Garden of Eden, comes from a root pregnant "fertility": the first homo is to piece of work in God'due south miraculously fertile garden.[75] The "tree of life" is a motif from Mesopotamian myth: in the Epic of Gilgamesh (c. 1800 BCE) the hero is given a constitute whose name is "man becomes young in old age", merely a snake steals the constitute from him.[76] [77] In that location has been much scholarly discussion about the blazon of knowledge given by the second tree. Suggestions include: human being qualities, sexual consciousness, ethical knowledge, or universal knowledge; with the final beingness the most widely accepted.[78] In Eden, mankind has a option betwixt wisdom and life, and chooses the first, although God intended them for the 2d.[79]

The mythic Eden and its rivers may correspond the real Jerusalem, the Temple and the Promised Land. Eden may represent the divine garden on Zion, the mountain of God, which was also Jerusalem; while the real Gihon was a spring outside the city (mirroring the spring which waters Eden); and the imagery of the Garden, with its ophidian and cherubs, has been seen as a reflection of the real images of the Solomonic Temple with its copper serpent (the nehushtan) and guardian cherubs.[fourscore] Genesis 2 is the merely identify in the Bible where Eden appears as a geographic location: elsewhere (notably in the Volume of Ezekiel) it is a mythological place located on the holy Mountain of God, with echoes of a Mesopotamian myth of the king as a primordial human being placed in a divine garden to baby-sit the tree of life.[81]

"Good and evil" is a merism, in this case meaning simply "everything", just information technology may also accept a moral connotation. When God forbids the man to eat from the tree of knowledge he says that if he does so he is "doomed to die": the Hebrew behind this is in the form used in the Bible for issuing death sentences.[82]

The first woman is created out of ane of Adam's ribs to be ezer kenegdo (עזר כנגדו‎ 'êzer kəneḡdō)[83] – a term notably difficult to translate – to the man. Kəneḡdō means "alongside, contrary, a counterpart to him", and 'êzer ways active intervention on behalf of the other person.[84] God's naming of the elements of the creation in Genesis i illustrated his authorisation over creation; at present the human being'southward naming of the animals (and of Woman) illustrates Adam's authority within creation.[85]

The woman is called ishah (אשה‎ 'iš-šāh), "Woman", with an caption that this is because she was taken from ish (אִישׁ‎ 'îš), meaning "man";[83] the 2 words are not in fact connected.[ commendation needed ] Later, afterwards the story of the Garden is consummate, she receives a name: Ḥawwāh (חוה ‎, Eve). This means "living" in Hebrew, from a root that can as well hateful "snake".[86] Assyriologist Samuel Noah Kramer connects Eve's creation to the ancient Sumerian myth of Enki, who was healed by the goddess Nin-ti, "the Lady of the rib"; this became "the Lady who makes live" via a pun on the word ti , which means both "rib" and "to brand live" in Sumerian.[87] The Hebrew word traditionally translated "rib" in English tin can likewise mean "side", "chamber", or "beam".[88] A long-standing exegetical tradition holds that the use of a rib from homo'southward side emphasizes that both man and woman have equal dignity, for adult female was created from the aforementioned material as man, shaped and given life by the same processes.[89]

Creationism and the genre of the creation narrative [edit]

The significant to exist derived from the Genesis creation narrative will depend on the reader'southward understanding of its genre, the literary "type" to which it belongs (e.g., scientific cosmology, creation myth, or historical saga).[90] According to Biblical scholar Francis Andersen, misunderstanding the genre of the text—pregnant the intention of the author(s) and the civilisation inside which they wrote—will result in a misreading.[91] Reformed evangelical scholar Bruce Waltke cautions against one such misreading: the "woodenly literal" approach, which leads to "creation science", but also to such "implausible interpretations" as the "gap theory", the presumption of a "young earth", and the denial of development.[7] As scholar of Jewish studies, Jon D. Levenson, puts it:

How much history lies backside the story of Genesis? Because the action of the primeval story is not represented as taking place on the plane of ordinary human history and has so many affinities with aboriginal mythology, information technology is very far-fetched to speak of its narratives equally historical at all."[92]

Another scholar, Conrad Hyers, summed up the same thought by writing, "A literalist interpretation of the Genesis accounts is inappropriate, misleading, and unworkable [considering] it presupposes and insists upon a kind of literature and intention that is non at that place."[93]

Whatever else it may exist, Genesis 1 is "story", since it features character and characterization, a narrator, and dramatic tension expressed through a series of incidents bundled in fourth dimension.[94] The Priestly author of Genesis one had to confront ii major difficulties. First, there is the fact that since only God exists at this point, no-i was available to be the narrator; the storyteller solved this by introducing an unobtrusive "third person narrator".[95] 2d, there was the problem of conflict: conflict is necessary to arouse the reader'south interest in the story, still with nothing else existing, neither a chaos-monster nor another god, there cannot be any conflict. This was solved by creating a very minimal tension: God is opposed by nothingness itself, the bare of the world "without form and void."[95] Telling the story in this mode was a deliberate pick: at that place are a number of cosmos stories in the Bible, but they tend to be told in the offset person, by Wisdom, the instrument by which God created the globe; the option of an omniscient third-person narrator in the Genesis narrative allows the storyteller to create the impression that everything is being told and nothing held back.[96]

One can also regard Genesis every bit "historylike", "role of a broader spectrum of originally anonymous, history-similar ancient Well-nigh Eastern narratives."[97] Scholarly writings oft refer to Genesis as myth, just at that place is no agreement on how to define "myth", and so while Brevard Childs famously suggested that the author of Genesis ane–11 "demythologised" his narrative, meaning that he removed from his sources (the Babylonian myths) those elements which did not fit with his own faith, others can say it is entirely mythical.[98]

Genesis 1–2 reflects ancient ideas nearly science: in the words of E.A. Speiser, "on the subject of creation biblical tradition aligned itself with the traditional tenets of Babylonian science."[99] The opening words of Genesis ane, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth", sum up the author(southward) belief that Yahweh, the god of State of israel, was solely responsible for creation and had no rivals.[100] Subsequently Jewish thinkers, adopting ideas from Greek philosophy, concluded that God's Wisdom, Word and Spirit penetrated all things and gave them unity.[101] Christianity in plow adopted these ideas and identified Jesus with the artistic word: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John i:one).[102] When the Jews came into contact with Greek idea, there followed a major reinterpretation of the underlying cosmology of the Genesis narrative. The biblical authors conceived the cosmos as a apartment disc-shaped World in the middle, an underworld for the dead below, and heaven above.[103] Below the Earth were the "waters of anarchy", the cosmic bounding main, domicile to mythic monsters defeated and slain by God; in Exodus 20:4, God warns against making an epitome "of anything that is in the waters under the world".[100] At that place were also waters higher up the Earth, and so the raqia (empyrean), a solid bowl, was necessary to go on them from flooding the earth.[104] During the Hellenistic period this was largely replaced past a more "scientific" model equally imagined past Greek philosophers, according to which the Earth was a sphere at the center of concentric shells of celestial spheres containing the Dominicus, Moon, stars and planets.[103]

The idea that God created the world out of cypher (creatio ex nihilo) has become central today to Islam, Christianity, and Judaism – indeed, the medieval Jewish philosopher Maimonides felt it was the just concept that the three religions shared[105] – yet information technology is non found direct in Genesis, nor in the entire Hebrew Bible.[106] The Priestly authors of Genesis 1 were concerned not with the origins of affair (the fabric which God formed into the habitable cosmos), but with assigning roles so that the Creation should function.[xxx] This was notwithstanding the situation in the early 2d century AD, although early Christian scholars were beginning to encounter a tension between the idea of world-formation and the omnipotence of God; past the beginning of the 3rd century this tension was resolved, world-germination was overcome, and creation ex nihilo had become a key tenet of Christian theology.[107]

Run across also [edit]

  • Adapa
  • Anno Mundi
  • Apollo eight Genesis reading
  • Atra-hasis ballsy
  • Allegorical interpretations of Genesis
  • Ancient About Eastern Texts Relating to the Former Testament
  • Babylonian mythology
  • Biblical chronology
  • Biblical cosmology
  • Biblical criticism
  • Christian mythology
  • Creation (disambiguation)
  • Creation–development controversy
  • Creation mandate
  • Cultural mandate
  • Enûma Eliš
  • Genesis flood narrative
  • Hexameron
  • Islamic cosmos narrative
  • Jewish mythology
  • Listing of creation myths
  • Mesopotamian mythology
  • Ningishzida
  • Primeval history
  • Religion and mythology
  • Sanamahi creation myth
  • Sumerian creation myth
  • Sumerian literature
  • Tower of Babel
  • Tree of the knowledge of skilful and evil

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ The term myth is used here in its academic sense, meaning "a traditional story consisting of events that are ostensibly historical, though frequently supernatural, explaining the origins of a cultural do or natural phenomenon." It is not being used to mean "something that is false".

Citations [edit]

  1. ^ Leeming & Leeming 2004, p. 113.
  2. ^ a b c Sarna 1997, p. 50.
  3. ^ a b Davies 2007, p. 37.
  4. ^ Bandstra 2008, p. 37.
  5. ^ Wenham 2003b, p. 37.
  6. ^ Alter 2004, p. xii.
  7. ^ a b Waltke 1991, pp. 6–9.
  8. ^ Speiser 1964, p. xxi.
  9. ^ Ska 2006, pp. 169, 217–18.
  10. ^ a b Alter 1981, p. 141.
  11. ^ Ruiten 2000, pp. ix–ten.
  12. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 9 "One aspect of narrative in Genesis that requires special attention is its loftier tolerance for different versions of the same event, a well-known feature of ancient Near Eastern literature, from earliest times through rabbinic midrash. ... This could not have happened if the beingness of variation were seen as a serious defect or if rigid consistency were deemed essential to effective storytelling."
  13. ^ a b Carr 1996, pp. 62–64.
  14. ^ Carr 1996, p. 64.
  15. ^ Cross 1973, pp. 301ff.
  16. ^ Thomas 2011, pp. 27–28.
  17. ^ a b Lambert 1965.
  18. ^ a b Levenson 2004, p. ix.
  19. ^ Leeming 2004.
  20. ^ Smith 2001.
  21. ^ Kutsko 2000, p. 62, quoting J. Maxwell Miller.
  22. ^ McDermott 2002, pp. 25–27.
  23. ^ Mark Smith; Wayne Pitard (2008). The Ugaritic Baal Wheel: Volume II. Introduction with Text, Translation and Commentary of KTU/True cat 1.iii–1.4. Brill. p. 615. ISBN978-90-474-4232-5.
  24. ^ Van Seters 1992, pp. 122–24.
  25. ^ Carr 1996, p. 242-248.
  26. ^ Dolansky 2016.
  27. ^ Fishbane 2003, pp. 34–35.
  28. ^ Hutton 2007, p. 274.
  29. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 13.
  30. ^ a b c Walton 2006, p. 183.
  31. ^ Hyers 1984, p. 74.
  32. ^ Wenham 1987, p. 6.
  33. ^ a b Overn 2017, p. 119.
  34. ^ Genesis 1:one–1:2
  35. ^ Bandstra 2008, pp. 38–39.
  36. ^ Spence 2010, p. 72.
  37. ^ Knight 1990, pp. 175–76.
  38. ^ a b Walton 2001.
  39. ^ Alter 2004, p. 17.
  40. ^ Thompson 1980, p. 230.
  41. ^ Wenham 2003a, p. 29.
  42. ^ Blenkinsopp 2011, pp. 33–34.
  43. ^ Blenkinsopp 2011, pp. 21–22.
  44. ^ Genesis 1:3–1:five
  45. ^ Walton 2003, p. 158.
  46. ^ Bandstra 2008, p. 39.
  47. ^ Genesis 1:vi–one:8
  48. ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 122.
  49. ^ Seeley 1991, p. 227.
  50. ^ Walton 2003, pp. 158–59.
  51. ^ Genesis 1:9–i:thirteen
  52. ^ Seeley 1997, p. 236.
  53. ^ Bandstra 2008, p. 41.
  54. ^ Kissling 2004, p. 106.
  55. ^ Genesis 1:14–ane:19
  56. ^ Bandstra 2008, pp. 41–42.
  57. ^ Walsh 2001, p. 37 (fn.5).
  58. ^ Hamilton 1990, p. 127.
  59. ^ Genesis 1:20–1:23
  60. ^ Walton 2003, p. 160.
  61. ^ Genesis i:24–31
  62. ^ Alter 2004, pp. 18–19, 21.
  63. ^ Kvam et al. 1999, p. 24.
  64. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 24.
  65. ^ Levenson 2004, p. xiv.
  66. ^ Rogerson 1991, pp. 19ff.
  67. ^ Knohl 2003, p. 13.
  68. ^ Genesis 2:1–2:3
  69. ^ Walton 2006, pp. 157–58.
  70. ^ a b Stordalen 2000, pp. 473–74.
  71. ^ Van Seters 1998, p. 22.
  72. ^ Andersen 1987, pp. 137–twoscore.
  73. ^ Alter 2004, pp. 20, 22.
  74. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 31.
  75. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 15.
  76. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 29.
  77. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 9 "The story of Adam and Eve's sin in the garden of Eden (2.25–3.24) displays similarities with Gilgamesh, an epic verse form that tells how its hero lost the opportunity for immortality and came to terms with his humanity. ... the biblical narrator has adjusted the Mesopotamian forerunner to Israelite theology."
  78. ^ Kooij 2010, p. 17.
  79. ^ Propp 1990, p. 193.
  80. ^ Stordalen 2000, pp. 307–x.
  81. ^ Davidson 1973, p. 33.
  82. ^ Modify 2004, p. 21.
  83. ^ a b Galambush 2000, p. 436.
  84. ^ Alter 2004, p. 22.
  85. ^ Turner 2009, p. 20.
  86. ^ Hastings 2003, p. 607.
  87. ^ Kramer 1963, p. 149.
  88. ^ Jacobs 2007, p. 37.
  89. ^ Hugenberger 1988, p. 184.
  90. ^ Wood 1990, pp. 323–24.
  91. ^ Andersen 1987, p. 142.
  92. ^ Levenson 2004, p. 11.
  93. ^ Hyers 1984, p. 28.
  94. ^ Cotter 2003, pp. 5–9.
  95. ^ a b Cotter 2003, p. 7.
  96. ^ Cotter 2003, p. viii.
  97. ^ Carr 1996, p. 21."In summary, rather than creating a fully new text after the way of a modern novelist or fifty-fifty a modernistic historian, ancient authors of historylike narratives like Gilgamesh or Genesis would ofttimes build their text out of earlier traditions. [...] Seen inside this perspective, Genesis is function of a broader spectrum of originally bearding, history-like ancient Near Eastern narratives."
  98. ^ Hamilton 1990, pp. 57–58.
  99. ^ Seidman 2010, p. 166.
  100. ^ a b Wright 2002, p. 53.
  101. ^ Kaiser 1997, p. 28.
  102. ^ Parrish 1990, pp. 183–84.
  103. ^ a b Aune 2003, p. 119.
  104. ^ Ryken et al 1998, p. 170
  105. ^ Soskice 2010, p. 24.
  106. ^ Nebe 2002, p. 119.
  107. ^ May 2004, p. 179.

References [edit]

  • Alter, Robert (1981). The Art of Biblical narrative. Basic Books. ISBN9780465004270.
  • Alter, Robert (2004). The Five Books of Moses. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN0-393-33393-0.
  • Andersen, Francis I. (1987). "On Reading Genesis ane–3". In O'Connor, Michael Patrick; Freedman, David Noel (eds.). Backgrounds for the Bible. Eisenbrauns. ISBN9780931464300.
  • Aune, David E. (2003). "Cosmology". Westminster Dictionary of the New Testament and Early Christian Literature. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN9780664219178.
  • Bandstra, Barry L. (2008). Reading the Onetime Testament: An Introduction to the Hebrew Bible. Wadsworth Publishing Company. p. 576. ISBN978-0-495-39105-0.
  • Blenkinsopp, Joseph (2011). Creation, Un-Creation, Re-Creation: A Discursive Commentary on Genesis 1–xi. T&T Clarke International. ISBN9780567372871.
  • Bouteneff, Peter C. (2008). Beginnings: Aboriginal Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narrative. M Rapids, Michigan: Baker Bookish. ISBN978-0-8010-3233-ii.
  • Brettler, Mark Zvi (2005). How To Read the Bible. Jewish Publication Lodge. ISBN9780827610019.
  • Brueggemann, Walter (1982). "Genesis one:ane–ii.4". Interpretation of Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 382. ISBN978-0-8042-3101-5.
  • Carr, David Grand. (1996). Reading the Fractures in Genesis. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN0-664-22071-1.
  • Carr, David Thou. (2011). "The Garden of Eden Story". An Introduction to the Onetime Testament. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN9781444356236.
  • Cotter, David W (2003). Genesis. Liturgical Press. ISBN9780814650400.
  • Cross, Frank Moore (1973). "The Priestly Work". Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel. Harvard University Printing. p. 394. ISBN0-674-09176-0.
  • Dalley, Stephanie (2000). Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, the Alluvion, Gilgamesh, and Others. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN9780192835895.
  • Davidson, Robert (1973). Genesis one–eleven. Cambridge University Press. ISBN9780521097604.
  • Davies, G.I. (2007). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Printing. ISBN9780199277186.
  • Dolansky, Shawna (2016). "The Multiple Truths of Myths". Biblical Archæology Review. 42 (1): 18, 60.
  • Fishbane, Michael (2003). Biblical Myth and Rabbinic Mythmaking. Oxford University Press. ISBN0-19-826733-9.
  • Friedman, Richard Elliott (2003). The Bible with Sources Revealed. HarperCollins. ISBN9780061951299.
  • Galambush, Julie (2000). "Eve". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. ISBN978-ix-0535-6503-2.
  • Ginzberg, Louis (1909). The Legends of the Jews (PDF). Jewish Publication Society. p. 695.
  • Graves, Robert; Patai, Raphael (1986). Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis. Random House. ISBN9780795337154.
  • Hamilton, Victor P (1990). The Volume of Genesis: Chapters ane–17. New International Commentary on the One-time Testament (NICOT). Chiliad Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 540. ISBN0-8028-2521-4.
  • Hastings, James (2003). Encyclopedia of Religion and Ideals, Part 10. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN978-0-7661-3682-iii.
  • Heidel, Alexander (1963). Babylonian Genesis (second ed.). Chicago University Press. ISBN0-226-32399-4.
  • Heidel, Alexander (1963). The Gilgamesh Ballsy and Old Testament Parallels (2nd Revised ed.). Chicago University Press. ISBN0-226-32398-half dozen.
  • Hugenberger, Thou.P. (1988). "Rib". In Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (ed.). The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Volume 4. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802837844.
  • Hutton, Jeremy (2007). "Isaiah 51:nine–11 and the Rhetorical Cribbing and Subversion of Hostile Theologies". Journal of Biblical Literature. Guild of Biblical Literature. 126 (2): 271–303. doi:10.2307/27638435. JSTOR 27638435.
  • Hyers, Conrad (1984). The Significant of Creation: Genesis and Mod Scientific discipline. Westminster John Knox. ISBN9780804201254.
  • Jacobs, Mignon R (2007). Gender, Power, and Persuasion: The Genesis Narratives and Contemporary Perspectives. Baker Academic. ISBN9780801027062.
  • Janzen, David (2004). The Social Meanings of Cede in the Hebrew Bible: A Study of Iv Writings. Walter de Gruyter Publisher. ISBN978-3-eleven-018158-6.
  • Kaiser, Christopher B. (1997). Creational Theology and the History of Physical Science. Brill. ISBN9004106693.
  • Kaplan, Aryeh (2002). "Hashem/Elokim: Mixing Mercy with Justice". The Aryeh Kaplan Reader: The Gift He Left Behind. Mesorah Publication, Ltd. p. 224. ISBN0-89906-173-7 . Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  • Keel, Othmar (1997). The Symbolism of the Biblical World. Eisenbrauns. ISBN9781575060149.
  • King, Leonard (2010). Enuma Elish: The Seven Tablets of Cosmos; The Babylonian and Assyrian Legends Concerning the Creation of the World and of Flesh. Cosimo Inc.
  • Kissling, Paul (2004). Genesis, Book i. Higher Press. ISBN9780899008752.
  • Knight, Douglas A (1990). "Cosmology". In Watson E. Mills (General Editor) (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN9780865543737.
  • Knohl, Israel (2003). The Divine Symphony: The Bible's Many Voices. Jewish Publication Society. ISBN9780827610187.
  • Kooij, Arie van der (2010). "The Story of Paradise in the Light of Mesopotamian Culture and Literature". In Dell, Katherine J; Davies, Graham; Koh, Yee Von (eds.). Genesis, Isaiah, and Psalms. Brill. ISBN978-9004182318.
  • Kramer, Samuel Noah (1956). History Begins at Sumer: Thirty-Nine Firsts in Recorded History.
  • Kramer, Samuel Noah (1963). The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character . Academy of Chicago Press. ISBN0-226-45238-7.
  • Kugler, Robert; Hartin, Patrick (2009). An Introduction to the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802846365.
  • Kutsko, John F. (2000). Between Heaven and Earth: Divine Presence and Absence in the Book of Ezekiel. Eisenbrauns. ISBN9781575060415.
  • Kvam, Kristen East.; Schearing, Linda South.; Ziegler, Valarie H., eds. (1999). Eve and Adam: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Readings on Genesis and Gender. Indiana University Press. p. 515. ISBN0-253-21271-5.
  • Lambert, W. G. (1965). "A New Look at the Babylonian Background of Genesis". The Journal of Theological Studies. Vol. 16, no. ii. pp. 287–300. JSTOR 23959032.
  • Leeming, David A. (2010). Cosmos Myths of the World: An Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. ABC-CLIO. ISBN9781598841749.
  • Leeming, David A. (2004). "Biblical creation". The Oxford Companion to Globe Mythology. Oxford University Press. Retrieved v May 2010.
  • Leeming, David A.; Leeming, Margaret (2004). A Dictionary of Creation Myths. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN9780195102758.
  • Levenson, Jon D. (2004). "Genesis: Introduction and Annotations". In Berlin, Adele; Brettler, Marc Zvi (eds.). The Jewish written report Bible . Oxford Academy Printing. ISBN9780195297515.
  • Louth, Andrew (2001). "Introduction". In Andrew Louth (ed.). Genesis ane–11. InterVarsity Press. ISBN9780830814718.
  • May, Gerhard (2004). Creatio Ex Nihilo (English trans. of 1994 ed.). T&T Clarke International. ISBN9780567083562.
  • McDermott, John J. (2002). Reading the Pentateuch: A Historical Introduction. Paulist Press. ISBN9780809140824.
  • McMullin, Ernin (2010). "Creation Ex Nihilo: Early History". In Burrell, David B.; Cogliati, Carlo; Soskice, Janet M.; Stoeger, William R. (eds.). Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN9781139490788.
  • Nebe, Gottfried (2002). "Cosmos in Paul'due south Theology". In Hoffman, Yair; Reventlow, Henning Graf (eds.). Cosmos in Jewish and Christian Tradition. Sheffield Bookish Printing. ISBN9780567573933.
  • Overn, William (March 2017). "Review: Repetition in the Bible" (PDF). Lutheran Synod Quarterly. 57 (1).
  • Parrish, Five. Steven (1990). "Creation". In Watson E. Mills (General Editor) (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN9780865543737.
  • Penchansky, David (November 2005). Twilight of the Gods: Polytheism in the Hebrew Bible. U.S.: Westminster/John Knox Press. ISBN0-664-22885-2.
  • Propp, W.H. (1990). "Eden Sketches". In Propp, Westward.H.; Halpern, Baruch; Freedman, D.N. (eds.). The Hebrew Bible and its Interpreters. Eisenbrauns. ISBN9780931464522.
  • Ruiten, Jacques T. A. Yard. Thousand. (2000). Primaeval History Interpreted. Brill. ISBN9004116583.
  • Rogerson, John William (1991). Genesis one–11. T&T Clark. ISBN9780567083388.
  • Sarna, Nahum Thou. (1997). "The Mists of Time: Genesis I–II". In Feyerick, Ada (ed.). Genesis: World of Myths and Patriarchs. New York: NYU Printing. p. 560. ISBN0-8147-2668-2.
  • Ryken, Leland; Wilhoit, Jim; Longman, Tremper; Duriez, Colin; Penney, Douglas; Reid, Daniel K., eds. (1998). "Cosmology". Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. InterVarsity Press. ISBN9780830867332.
  • Sawyer, John F.A. (1992). "The Image of God, the Wisdom of Serpents, and the Knowledge of Good and Evil". In Paul Morris, Deborah Sawyer (ed.). A Walk in the Garden: Biblical, Iconographical and Literary Images of Eden. Sheffield Academic Printing Press. ISBN9780567024473.
  • Schwartz, Howard; Loebel-Fried, Caren; Ginsburg, Elliot Yard. (2007). Tree of Souls: The Mythology of Judaism. Oxford University Press. p. 704. ISBN9780195358704.
  • Seidman, Naomi (2010). "Translation". In Ronald Hendel (ed.). Reading Genesis: 10 Methods. Cambridge Academy Printing. ISBN9780521518611.
  • Seeley, Paul H. (1991). "The Firmament and the Water Higher up: The Meaning of Raqia in Genesis 1:6–8" (PDF). Westminster Theological Journal. Westminster Theological Seminary. 53: 227–xl. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 11 December 2007.
  • Seeley, Paul H. (1997). "The Geographical Meaning of 'Earth' and 'Seas' in Genesis 1:x" (PDF). Westminster Theological Journal. Westminster Theological Seminary. 59: 231–55.
  • Ska, Jean-Louis (2006). Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Eisenbrauns. ISBN9781575061221.
  • Smith, Marker South. (October 2002). The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel (2nd ed.). William B Eerdmans Publishing Co. ISBN0-8028-3972-10.
  • Smith, Mark Due south. (November 2001). The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (New ed.). Oxford University Printing USA. ISBN0-19-516768-half-dozen.
  • Soskice, Janet M. (2010). "Creatio ex nihilo: its Jewish and Christian foundations". In Burrell, David B.; Cogliati, Carlo; Soskice, Janet Yard.; Stoeger, William R. (eds.). Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge Academy Printing. ISBN9781139490788.
  • Speiser, Ephraim Avigdor (1964). Genesis . Doubleday.
  • Spence, Lewis (2010) [1916]. Myths and Legends of Babylonia and Assyria. Cosimo, Inc. p. 72. ISBN978-1616404642.
  • Stenhouse, John (2000). "Genesis and Science". In Gary B. Ferngren (ed.). The History of Scientific discipline and Faith in the Western Tradition: An Encyclopedia. New York, London: Garland Publishing, Inc. p. 76. ISBN0-8153-1656-9.
  • Stagg, Evelyn and Frank (1978). "Genesis and Science". Woman in the Globe of Jesus. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Westminster Press. p. 135. ISBN0-664-24195-6.
  • Stordalen, Terje (2000). Echoes of Eden. Peeters. ISBN9789042908543.
  • Thomas, Matthew A. (2011). These Are the Generations: Identity, Covenant and the Toledot Formula. T&T Clark (Continuum). ISBN9780567487643.
  • Thompson, J. A. (1980). Jeremiah . New International Commentary on the Onetime Testament (second ed.). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Visitor. p. 831. ISBN0-8028-2530-3. J.A Thompson Jeremiah.
  • Tsumura, David Toshio (2005). Creation And Destruction: A Reappraisal of the Chaoskampf Theory in the Old Testament. Eisenbrauns. ISBN9781575061061.
  • Turner, Laurence A. (2009). Genesis. Sheffield Phoenix Press. ISBN9781906055653.
  • Van Seters, John (1998). "The Pentateuch". In McKenzie, Steven L.; Graham, M. Patrick (eds.). The Hebrew Bible Today: An Introduction to Critical Issues. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN9780664256524.
  • Van Seters, John (1992). Prologue to History: The Yahwist As Historian in Genesis. New International Commentary on the Onetime Testament. Westminster John Knox Printing. ISBN0-664-22179-3.
  • Walsh, Jerome T. (2001). Way and Structure in Biblical Hebrew Narrative. Liturgical Printing. ISBN9780814658970.
  • Waltke, Bruce (1991). "The Literary Genre of Genesis, Chapter One" (PDF). Crux. Westminster Theological Seminary. 27:4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 Apr 2014.
  • Walton, John H. (2006). Ancient Well-nigh Eastern Idea and the Old Attestation: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. Baker Academic. ISBN0-8010-2750-0.
  • Walton, John H. (2003). "Cosmos". In T. Desmond Alexander, David Weston Baker (ed.). Lexicon of the One-time Attestation: Pentateuch. InterVarsity Printing. ISBN9780830817818.
  • Walton, John H. (2001). Genesis. Zondervan. ISBN978-0-310-86620-6.
  • Walton, John H.; Matthews, Victor H.; Chavalas, Marker W. (2000). "Genesis". The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Attestation. InterVarsity Press. ISBN9780830814190.
  • Wenham, Gordon (2003a). Exploring the One-time Attestation: A Guide to the Pentateuch. Exploring the Bible Series. Vol. i. IVP Bookish. p. 223.
  • Wenham, Gordon (2003b). "Genesis". In Dunn, James Douglas Grant; Rogerson, J. John William (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802837110.
  • Wenham, Gordon (1987). Genesis 1–15. Vol. 1 and two. Texas: Word Books. ISBN0-8499-0200-2.
  • Whybray, R.N (2001). "Genesis". In John Barton (ed.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN9780198755005.
  • Wood, Ralpth C (1990). "Genre, Concept of". In Watson Eastward. Mills (General Editor) (ed.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Printing. ISBN9780865543737.
  • Wright, J. Edward (2002). The Early History of Heaven. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN9780195348491.
  • Wylen, Stephen G. (2005). "Affiliate 6 Midrash". The Seventy Faces of Torah: The Jewish way of Reading the Sacred Scriptures. Paulist Press. p. 256. ISBN0-8091-4179-5.

External links [edit]

Biblical texts [edit]

  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 (Hebrew-English language text, translated according to the JPS 1917 Edition)
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 (Hebrew–English text, with Rashi's commentary. The translation is the administrative Judaica Press version, edited by Rabbi A.J. Rosenberg.)
  • Chapter 1 Chapter 2 (New American Bible)
  • Chapter 1 Affiliate 2 (King James Version)
  • Chapter i Chapter ii (Revised Standard Version)
  • Chapter one Affiliate 2 (New Living Translation)
  • Affiliate 1 Chapter two (New American Standard Bible)
  • Chapter i Chapter two (New International Version (United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland))

Mesopotamian texts [edit]

  • "Enuma Elish", at Encyclopedia of the Orient Summary of Enuma Elish with links to full text.
  • ETCSL – Text and translation of the Eridu Genesis (alternating site) (The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, Oxford)
  • "Epic of Gilgamesh" (summary)
  • British Museum: Cuneiform tablet from Sippar with the story of Atra-Hasis

[edit]

  • Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).

kurzwholed.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative

0 Response to "Reading Plan the Biblical Narrative in Five Acts"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel